The social nature of Web 2.0 is suited to public libraries. The interaction and participation it extends to both users and librarians creates an easy sharing of ideas, thoughts and knowledge.
The light side
To give one example in a Public Library:
The knowledge of Local History that sits buried in a community can surface more easily. For example, previously unidentified photographs can be identified or have comments placed beside them, new photographs and stories of the local area can be easily added from anywhere in the world. Displaying as a Mash up (see previous post) would be fun.
Sharing with local groups with the same interest such as Historical Societies, Museums in a transparent,visual and virtual must present a more encompassed local history. However will it be preserved for generations to come? The dark side
Is this a vulnerable way to collect information you want to preserve? The internet is based on having an energy supply, fast telecommunication, tools are supplied by very large, privately- owned companies who desire capital gain. Will this divide people, and if unplugged - how do we find what we are looking for?
An interesting short story ' The Sorcerers' by Primo Levi - two academics cannot recreate technology when most needed.
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(26)
-
▼
August
(8)
- Wikipedia is knowledgeable and useful even though...
- Web 2.0
- TechnoratiFound this searching tool very messy - l...
- A headnote for a footnote found onhttp://www.footn...
- TAG TAG TAG TAG TAGGINGTHOUGHTSa LARGE of people e...
- A picture of an RSS (from Google Images - www.thor...
- This video on YouTube (placed by 3ertin) describes...
- This mash up was voted one of the best - described...
-
▼
August
(8)
No comments:
Post a Comment